# The rimstar.org Blog

 Web rimstar.org

## December 9, 2010

### Can 100 Miles of Mirrors solar thermal power the US?

Category: Renewable energy

In the SimplySolar Yahoo Group someone recently asked if the claim that 100 by 100 miles, 10,000 square miles, of concentrated solar thermal power could provide enough electricity to power all of the US. The claim was made at http://www.100milesofmirrors.com under the banner 100 Miles of Mirrors. To verify the feasibility of the claim I did the research and calculations given below.

#### A brief intro to solar thermal

Briefly, as the following diagram shows, concentrated solar thermal power involves concentrating the suns energy using parabolic mirrors. For 10,000 square feet of this there would be many, many such rows of mirrors. The mirrors focus all that energy onto a pipe that contains oil, heating the oil. Using a heat exchanger, the heat from the oil turns water into steam. The steam is run through a steam turbine which turns a generator and produces electricity. The steam is next run through a condensor to turn it back into water for use again. The heated oil can also be used to heat salt until it’s molten. This stores the heat for when the sun isn’t shining, at which time the heat in the molten salt acts as the heat source to heat the oil which is then used to turn water to steam to spin the turbine and run the generator.

#### The calculations

To do calculations I first needed to find a solar thermal field in Arizona to act as a baseline for calculations. I found this announcement that Albiasa Solar of Spain is building a 200 MW (megawatts, or million watts) concentrated solar themal power field in Arizona and further digging found that the field was 1,400 acres in size.

Step 1. The proposed 100 miles of mirrors is really 100 miles by 100 miles which is a 10,000 square mile solar thermal field (100 multiplied by 100.)

Step 2. 10,000 square miles divided by 0.0015625 square miles per acre means that the field is 6,400,000 acres (1 acre is 0.0015625 square miles.)

Step 3. In 6,400,000 acres you can fit 4,571 solar thermal fields the size of the Albiasa Solar field being built in Arizona (6,400,000 acres divided by 1,400 acres.)

Step 4. Since the Albiasa Solar field produces 200 MW of electricity, that means the production of the 100 miles or mirrors field would be 914,200 MW (4,571 * 200 MW.) That’s 914 GW (gigawatts, or billion watts.)

Step 5. According to Wikipedia in 2007, US summer demand for electricity was 783 GW. That means at any one time the peak demand for solar in the US in 2007 was 783 GW.

Step 6. The 100 miles or mirrors of solar thermal plan would produce 914 GW while the US needs at most 783 GW at any one time. So it looks like the plan is reasonable.

Of course it’s often pointed out that the sun doesn’t always shine. But as said above, the concentrated solar thermal systems store heat in molten salt so that this heat can be used to continue generating power while the sun is no longer shining.

Then there’s the issue of transmission losses. When transmitting electricity over large distances much of that power is lost. Given that the 783 GW is peak demand in the US, that means that at other times the demand is less. So for those non-peak times, enough power may be generated. During peak demand, when 783 GW is needed, it may be necessary to draw on some of the stored energy to add to the 914 GW being produced in order to meet the demand plus make up for transmission losses.

One last thing. 100 miles of mirrors doesn’t sound like a big deal. But remember, it’s 100 miles by 100 miles, or 10,000 square miles. Here’s what that looks like overlaid on a map of Arizona.

But don’t let that scare you. If all the farm land in the US were highlighted instead, the area would be larger. And none of that farm land needs the desert.

#### Conclusion

In conclusion, from my quick calculations the 100 Miles of Mirrors concentrated solar thermal power plan could generate enough power to meet the needs of the US.

rachat de credit
January 5, 2011 @ 5:52 am

Il semble que vous soyez un expert dans ce domaine, vos remarques sont tres interessantes, merci.

- Daniel

RoagoAvaida
February 19, 2011 @ 7:36 pm

Nice site ….)

Steve
February 20, 2011 @ 8:46 am

@RoagoAvaida Thanks!

SparkyJP
March 3, 2011 @ 8:08 pm

Instead of giving billions of dollars in subsidies to oil and gas corporations to find the last drop of oil left in the world; projects like this should be invested in to provide jobs and keep our dollars within the US. It really is a national security issue.

Steve
March 4, 2011 @ 10:25 am

@SparkyJP, I certainly wouldn’t disagree with that. Also, these things will be lot harder to do when oil is scarse.

Lavon
April 25, 2011 @ 6:59 am

You’ve hit the ball out the park! Inecridlbe!

Bill
July 30, 2011 @ 10:33 pm

I think this is a very interesting idea. Personally, however, I think it would be much more realistic to have the solar panels spread out across the country. This would cut down on transmission costs and would limit probabilities of blackouts. If, for example, every major Walmart-like store had it’s roof lined with solar panels, it could have much the same effect. Our local Walmart has about 100 m x 150 m = 15000 m^2 = 0.00579153238 mi^2 of roof space. There are 2933 Walmart Supercenters in the US, making 16.9 mi^2 total roof space. Say, to be conservative, we cut this down by a factor of 2, so we’re talking about approximately 8% of the national energy needs. (This may not seem like much, but remember we currently get less than 0.1% of our electricity from solar. A jump to almost 8% would be huge!) If we additionally consider other large-size stores and facilities (like other hypermarkets, factories, warehouses, even private residences, etc), this could already supply a significant percentage of the US energy needs, without any additional investment of landspace or power grid. The government and power companies could give more financial incentives to motivate participation. The big concern would be making solar power setups that would be efficient enough and cost-effective enough on a smaller-scale like this. I imagine market forces will take care of this as demands increase. This setup might not be able to reach 100% of the US electricity needs, but it could make a huge dent in our consumption of fossil fuels without a whole lot of additional infrastructure.

Bill
July 30, 2011 @ 10:36 pm

Oops! I just realized my calculations were considering 100 mi^2 to fulfill total US energy needs, not 10,000 mi^2. Well, my numbers are a bit off, but the principle should still work. We’d just need more existing structures invested.

Steve
July 31, 2011 @ 9:21 am

Bill,
Thanks for your thoughts and I totally agree. A distributed solar energy grid is a better way to go than just one or two central sources. There are already a lot of incentives for having people sell to the grid in the US and hopefully they stay in place until PV becomes as cheap as other generation means. Here in Ontario, Canada we have the FIT and microFIT programs which allow solar farms, companies such as Walmart and residences to use PV to sell to the grid at a premium price to make up for the high cost of solar panels (http://rimstar.org/renewnrg/ontario_microfit_feed_in_tariff.htm). I don’t know how well our (US and Canada) electricity transmission infrastructure is set up to handle this, so that’s an issue, one which we’re addressing here.

металлоконструкции
August 19, 2011 @ 3:03 pm

Я согласен с вами