July 12, 2003 - Only up to 46kVBefore assembling my probe I did some preliminary tests to see if the resistors would hold up. The highest voltage I could measure before my power supply arced was 46kV. This was a little disappointing since my power supply was supposed to put out between 50kV and 150kV. Instead the initial reading on the meter was about 28kV and as I said, it arced at 46kV. The spark length is not a reliable measure here since the diameter of the spheres (2.2 cm) on either side of the spark gap was significantly smaller than the gap size (4.1 cm). So either there is a problem with my probe setup, there is substantial leakage, or my supply doesn't put out as much as I thought. There was some leakage as hissing was heard from where connection was made to the power supply. Using a simple 6V battery, through the probe it reported 6.0V (.0060Vx1000) but without the probe it reported 5.5V. I'm not sure what to think of that difference (see July 17th entry below for the solution).
July 13, 2003 - Maxed out on variac without arcing (62kV)I realized that my arcing was probably being caused prematurely by leakage at the spark gap at the power supply (see pictures below). I figured that leakage there would create an ionization path in the air between the balls and cause arcing at lower voltage than one would expect given the gap size. So I tried a number improvements until finally I could turn my power supply's variac up as far as its stops would allow it to go without arcing. This gave me 62kV on the meter with an arcless spark gap of 7.2cm.
July 17, 2003 - Solved the battery measurement problemWhen doing my battery test on July 12 (see above) it turns out I was using the wrong range on my meter when meassuring through the resistor network and therefore getting less accuracy. I switched from the DC V range to the DC mV range and the meter was now giving me around 55mV (1000th of the value without the resistor network). July 18, 2003 - Testing power line ACAt Zoltan Losonc's suggestion I measured the AC power line on my DMM and got around 118V. I then measured through my resistor network and measured around 470mv (milli, not micro) but it seemed to change a lot. It would start around 470mV then steadily decrease until I pulled it out and put it back in again. Again at Zoltan's suggestion, I then removed the 10M ohm resistor that was in parallel with the DMM and replaced it with my oscilloscope. It turns out that my resistor network as laid out on the table as it is is acting as an antenna. It's picking up the 60Hz signal. When the ends of the reistor network are not connected to anything I get around 210mV RMS at around 60Hz (see 1st picture below). When I connect the ends to the power lines I get an RMS that fluctuates between around 470mV to 490mV RMS at around 60Hz (see 2nd picture below). Note: after taking these pictures and loading them into the computer I had the idea of improving my connections to the power lines by adapting an old plug. The values I now get are different but still demonstrate the antenna behaviour. Even with the camera in place with its extension chord I see a slight change on the scope. I don't think the values are so important as the fact that the resistor network, when strung out like this, is picking up an AC signal that needs to be eliminated either through sheilding, shape of the network, or something. Note that during the measurements below, the reading on the DMM matched the RMS on the scope.
July 20, 2003 - First high voltage measurements with oscilloscopeThe Input Impedance, DC Coupled, for my scope is 1Mohm +/-2% in parallel with 20pF +/= 3pF and its maximum voltage is 300V RMS. However, I'm using a X10 probe with the scope which has a 9Mohm resistor for a total of 10Mohm impedance. This means I can put my scope in place of my DMM and make measurements. My only concern was damaging the much more expensive scope but in my desire to get on with it, I took a chance. Good thing I did too. Speaking to the maker of the power supply (Information Unlimited), he said that under no load the output should be fairly flat DC and that under load there will be more ripple. With a high frequency output there would be issues with using my simple probe with my scope but since it's fairly flat DC the combination should work fine. I made 3 sets of measurements: 29kV, 46kV, 52kV. For each one I made a simple voltage reading with the DMM, turned off the power supply without touching the dial on the power supply, discharged the power supply, replaced the DMM with the scope, turned on the power supply, and made various measurements on the scope. The scope and DMM voltage measurements matched. Using the scope, I noticed that each voltage had two AC waves riding on it. A 60Hz, 2V (2kV) (approximately) wave and a 12kHz, 4V (4kV) (approximately) wave. Note that the voltage values on the scope should be multiplied by 1000 to get the actual kV values as I've done in the previous sentence. Neither wave seems to change in either amplitude or frequency with different power supply voltages. This means the higher the voltage, the less the effect these waves will have on measurements. I'm guessing the 12kHz is power supply ripple. I would have suspected that the 60Hz was because my HV probe is acting as an antenna but 2kV is a bit much unless it is being amplified somehow by the power supply meaning that some or all may actually be from the power line feeding into the power supply. Note that this was all done with no load on the power supply. The following pictures illustrate all of this. 29kV measurements
46kV measurements
52kV measurements
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||